Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong J. L. Mackie
Publisher:

For instance, little bits of both realist Singer's "The Expanding Circle" and anti-realist Mackie's "Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong" seem to indicate agreement with this theory. And I don't necessarily buy a theory quite that specific even though I agree with 90 per cent of what I read in Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. See Joshua Greene's The Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Truth About Morality and What To Do About It, and J.L. 12Nick Zangwill, "Moral Supervenience," in Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XX (1995), p. The most famous moral Error Theorist is J. This is along the lines of Mackie's argument from queerness. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977), p. For Mackie, right and wrong are invented on the basis of self-interest and/or cooperative gains. It seems we have forgotten that we, human beings, invented this economy. This is demonstrated perfectly by a glance at the current state of our world. Mackie's focal point in his “Ethics”, with a skeptical view, is the query of the objectivity of moral values and the status of ethics in human life. Ethics is a form of philosophy which seeks to categorise, codify and champion concepts of right and wrong. The first chapter is sufficient for getting the argument. Mackie (1917 – 1981), who defended the metaethical view in his 1977 “Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong”. Some will seek to demonstrate the existence of an objective, universal morality with . €we need an evolutionary understanding of where a strong sense of right and wrong comes from as an instinct, and a neurobiological account of how our brains function (or malfunction) when they engage in ethical reasoning. To anyone interested in getting a fuller exposition, I highly recommend his “Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong”. Not an easy task when what is considered right and wrong is almost, if not always, a matter of perception. Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.